Why did it take so long to remove hate graffiti?

Sign in to add photos, videos, links, corrections, or to follow this file.

Why did it take so long to remove hate graffiti?

Michelle Singerman's picture
Reported by Michelle Singerman
Reported on Sunday, August 29, 2010
Updated on Sunday, September 12, 2010
Do you think it took too long for the graffiti to be removed? Would you have acted sooner to remove the swastika if you lived in the area?

VIEW ORIGINAL FILE

Michelle Singerman

I was walking through a parking alley the other day as a shortcut to my house. Almost all the garages in the throughway had been "tagged" or vandalized in some manner. But nothing caught my eye the way the giant white Swastika did. What's worse is that the hate symbol remains in place after all these days. There's a graffiti bylaw in Toronto as well as a Graffiti Eradication program through Toronto Police, not to mention several anti-hate organizations. How is a symbol that represents such hatred and discrimination surviving in the open? Even more, the Swastika is painted on someone's private property. Does the owner not have a responsibility to remove it? It seems as though no one in the area is doing anything about this. Whose responsibility it is to remove, why is nothing being done and how does the community feel about it? As a human rights activist and Jewish female, I want answers.

UPDATE

Why did it take so long to remove hate graffiti?

Reported on Friday, September 10, 2010

When the city deadline expired for a homeowner to remove a swastika from property in Little Italy, the graffiti remained. It wasn’t until OpenFile was in contact with Toronto Police Service’s 14 Division almost a week later that the ball began to roll.

If the swastika was hidden among other tagging, it might not have been unusual for the graffiti to prevail as long as it did, simply for lack of being noticed, explained Detective Sgt. Brian Kelly. But in this case, the hate symbol existed as a stand-alone sign on a garage door in a public laneway for several weeks.

“It’s not acceptable,” he said. “I’m surprised they [Toronto’s Municipal Licensing and Standards Division] gave it 10 days,” referring to the city’s 10-day graffiti removal bylaw.

When first asked about the graffiti on Thursday morning, Kelly said his division had been unaware of the long-standing vandalism. “We have no documentation,” Kelly said. “There’s no hate crime reported here.”

Because it’s Rosh Hashanah, the Jewish new year, police are even more aware of such crimes, he said.

Anita Bromberg of Jewish advocacy organization B’Nai Brith was also surprised to learn the swastika remained on view. “If it’s private [property], then a visit from the police nine times out of 10 cleans it up,” she said

But in this case, a house call from the police almost never happened. The city didn’t notify 14 Division of the graffiti when it was first reported.

When he learned of the swastika on Thursday, Kelly immediately sent an officer to the Euclid Ave. property, where the graffiti was photographed and documented. An officer spent several minutes knocking on the homeowner’s door, but to no avail.

Kelly was also in touch with the city, which promised to have the hateful symbol covered over by that afternoon. He guessed the city’s slow reaction time could have been because the person in charge was unaware the vandalism was in fact a swastika spanning an area of several feet. “Once I told him the severity and the timing of it, [removal] was done expeditiously,” Kelly said late Thursday afternoon.

But Elizabeth Glibbery, the licensing and standards division district manager who was first notified about the swastika a few weeks ago, insisted her team had been working on the case all along.

When asked why it had taken so long for something so offensive to be removed, Glibbery said the property owner had promised to get rid of the swastika by last weekend. And when that didn’t happen, a city officer was sent to undertake the cleanup at the property owner’s expense, which happened to be Thursday afternoon.

Glibbery confirmed the swastika has been documented as a hate crime. She asked that people call 311 should the symbol reappear.

Although Kelly is confident in the city and its commitment to remove graffiti, he says of the swastika, “It wouldn’t have come down if I hadn’t phoned today.”


Do you think it took too long for the graffiti to be removed? Would you have acted sooner to remove the swastika if you were a resident in the area?

In a multicultural city, hate vandalism isn’t unusual. But in a quiet Little Italy community just north of College St., a spray-painted swastika has remained on display in a laneway for weeks. Neighbours aren’t sure when the hate symbol appeared, but it has been there long enough that the paint has begun to fade.

When graffiti appears on private property, it’s the owner’s responsibility to remove it. Once the city is aware of the vandalism, a notice is sent to the home or business owner to remove the graffiti within 72 hours. The problem in this case is that no one was in any rush to alert the city or the police.

“Sometimes property owners will see graffiti, but they won’t report it, they won’t complain about it,” said Staff Sgt. Heinz Kuck, coordinator of the Toronto Police Service Graffiti Eradication Program. If it’s in a secluded spot, “it could be there for weeks, months or even years.”

Markings like the Nazi emblem usually draw attention fairly quickly and the fact that this hate symbol is still up is “an anomaly,” Kuck said.

“Obviously people in that particular laneway seeing that swastika are not being affected.”

The lane runs behind a residential street and has no shortage of graffiti, though most of it is standard tagging. “You’re not going to have a lot of people going though that laneway day-to-day,” explained Kuck, “but if they do and they see it, they have accepted that level of graffiti and the swastika as part of the esthetics of that laneway, and they’re not going to change it. It becomes acceptance.”

This apathy is fought through education, one of the five tiers of the police graffiti eradication program. (The others are eradication, empowerment, enforcement and economic development). Through workshops and lectures in communities and schools, the team tries to show residents the harmful effects of graffiti and certain symbols.

And while some may argue that graffiti has merit, Kuck said it doesn’t in this case. “A swastika is a swastika. It is not an artistic expression. It is one-dimensional and should be removed by the property owner.”

Because having one tag simply invites more tagging, Kuck said, his program encourages the removal of graffiti within 24 to 48 hours.

Anita Bromberg of B’nai Brith Canada, the Jewish advocacy organization, wondered why no one in the community had acted on the racist and anti-Semitic symbol. “To accept a certain level of intolerance means a defeat in our struggle to create a civil society,” she said.

Bromberg agreed that community activism plays a big part in fighting hate and vandalism. “You can turn these people over to the police, you can leave it in the police hands, but the other part of it is education,” she said. “It’s very important that we involve the kids to understand what avoiding hate is.”

Like Kuck, she had a theory on why no one acted on the sprayed swastika. “When people are confronted by hate, they tend to internalize it,” she explained. “So you could have a lot of people who don’t know who to report it to.”

Local resident Katie Morgan, who had just returned from a month-long road trip out east, was unaware of the hate graffiti a few metres away during an interview, though the idea made her visibly uncomfortable.

“It’s important for people to know that they can’t be doing that,” Morgan said. “With tagging it’s not nice, but to put fear into people, something that could cause anxiety or disgust...” She trailed off, looking in the direction of the graffiti.

Morgan said she thinks of her neighbourhood as community-oriented, so this type of vandalism caught her off-guard. “It just feels weird to see that. And it’s disturbing the peace,” she said.

Barry Speers, who has lived in the area for more than 25 years, said he had never before seen a swastika in the laneway where he parks. “I noticed that, it’s awful. And especially [because] it hasn’t been taken down.”

But Speers, whose garage is a few metres away from the defaced door, didn’t act on the vandalism, despite his discomfort with it.

“What am I going to do, call the police?” he asked.

In fact, citizens have a duty to alert the authorities, Kuck said.

“For the most part, it’s driven by a community to identify and to remove [hate graffiti]. It’s their property and it’s their responsibility. And we’re asking people to take pride in home ownership and business ownership,” he said.

Residents are encouraged to report graffiti to the city’s municipal licensing and standards division. When the city receives a complaint, it issues a notice to the homeowner to remove the graffiti, said Elizabeth Glibbery, East York district manager.

“We understand it takes time to notify the property owners, [so] although the bylaw says 72 hours, we’ll give them at least 10 days to comply.”

If the city has to do the cleanup after that time, it will bill the property owner.

As of Aug. 24, a city notice was taped to the front door of the house with the vandalized garage. The person who answered the door did not speak English and no one else was home at the time.

The swastika is “a benchmark symbol of hate,” Kuck said. “Why that property owner hasn’t acted I can’t say, and why that property owner’s neighbours haven’t is even more horrendous.”

To report graffiti in your area, call 311.

Have you seen hate graffiti in your neighbourhood? How did you react? What's your opinion on graffiti eradication and community responsibility? Tell us in the comments below.

Javascript is required to view this map.

POST A COMMENT

You must Log in or Sign Up to post a comment
HJH's picture

Wow - this is terrible and SCARY and the fact that no one seems to be doing anything to change the situation is even scarier. I think people are relying on 'power in numbers' and just assuming that someone else is taking care of it. Relying on others to solve problems (or assuming that a problem is already on its way to being solved) is dangerous and not a solution to something as big as this. I'm happy to see that not only the graffiti itself has been reported, but the fact the no one seems to be doing anything about it is being discussed as well.

LT's picture

The fact that hate vandalism still exists is a hard pill to swallow; that no one seems to be acting on it makes it that much more offensive. Why is it that society doesn't take a proactive approach to negative acts? Generally speaking, it seems like we see things happen around us, and avert our eyes, rather than taking a stand and making a change. Glad to see this reported, and will be somewhat more satisfied when the immediate problem, ie the graffiti being removed, is taken care of.

dgoodman6's picture

This is egregious - the indifference towards this by the community and the police force is a direct insult to the Jewish community and a scary message to the community at large through the lenience of their condemnation about hate graffiti.

Michelle Singerman's picture

It has been almost 10 days since the since the city first gave notice to the homeowner to have the graffiti removed. The deadline is up Fri. Sept. 3 and there has still been no change to the vandalism. Staff Sgt. Heinz Kuck of the Toronto Police Service Graffiti Eradication Program is surprised to learn the swastika remains posted on the homeowner’s garage, calling this specific case “peculiar.”

Although it can take time for property owners to swing into action, “Not when it comes to anything that’s hate-based,” Kuck said. “My experience has been that property owners and business owners take pride in their homes and businesses, and recognize the negative symbolism, they jump on it right away. Immediately. Within 24 hours of being notified by neighbours or the police.”

According to Toronto’s graffiti bylaw, the property owner has the right to fight the removal of graffiti based on artistic merit. But in the case of this swastika, there is no argument. “This is clear and compelling and hate-based,” Kuck said. “I’m beside myself these people haven’t acted.”

If the owner does not clean up the graffiti by Friday's 10-day deadline, the city ends up doing the dirty work and will bill the property owner for the cost. Other than paying for the graffiti removal, there are no ramifications for non-compliance with the city notice, Kuck said.

And because these inspectors have so many cases to work, ones that don’t just involve graffiti, their scheduling doesn’t always allow for an immediate check-up following the removal deadline. Kuck says it can take days, “even weeks,” for the city to do a follow-up check. And even then, inspectors will often have to come back with a contractor and supplies to remove the swastika that has already been up for several weeks.

Michelle Singerman's picture

As of Monday, Aug. 30, the swastika in the laneway remains up. The 72-hour notice was posted five days ago, meaning the property owner's deadline was this past Friday (August 27). There have been no changes to the graffiti since this story was first reported.

OUR FOUNDING SPONSOR

SEE HOW TD IS ENGAGED WITH YOUR COMMUNITY

We work with other media companies to build engagement with readers, and source unique local stories to complement news coverage. Contact us for more information.